Community
Arnold General Rendering Forum
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

C4DtoA Polymesh to Volume Tutorial

17 REPLIES 17
Reply
Message 1 of 18
LMimagery
877 Views, 17 Replies

C4DtoA Polymesh to Volume Tutorial

I am trying to follow Lee's tutorial on Polymesh to Volume with C4DtoA. I used a head and get it to render as a volume with the settings reccommended, but when I add an Arnold Volume to the back of the head nothing appears....I am sure this is my inexperience, but do not know why I get nothing with the same shader applied as the tutorial instructs, and this does not allow me to go forward. Thank you for any help,the site will not allow me to attach my .c4d file

17 REPLIES 17
Message 2 of 18
lee_griggs
in reply to: LMimagery

Is the head model a closed surface, otherwise the volume may not render correctly. More info here.

>the site will not allow me to attach my .c4d file

Are you logged in?

Lee Griggs
Arnold rendering specialist
AUTODESK
Message 3 of 18
LMimagery
in reply to: LMimagery

The head is not closed but it is rendering fine, when I add the Arnold volume to the back of the head nothing appears...I am logged in, the site seems to want just pictutre files not .c4d

Message 4 of 18
LMimagery
in reply to: LMimagery

I will get a closed object for the head though

Message 5 of 18
lee_griggs
in reply to: LMimagery

>The head is not closed but it is rendering fine

As a volume or as a surface? Can you share some images?

Lee Griggs
Arnold rendering specialist
AUTODESK
Message 6 of 18
LMimagery
in reply to: LMimagery

I think the head is rendering as a volume....but I am trying this with a sphere now....in you head example is the Arnold Volume object you add a VDB?

Message 7 of 18
LMimagery
in reply to: LMimagery

Here is a shot of the head...Nowscreen-shot-2017-11-24-at-84416-am.png I see I can get the Volume Sphere or Box to show...so again is your example using a VDB, and what is necessary for that...I have tried to attache a few VDB's I have from somewhere and they do not render...are there special settings? If you are using a VDB is that available somewhere?

Message 8 of 18
lee_griggs
in reply to: LMimagery

That looks fine. Yes, it uses a VDB. More information about volumes and VDB files with scene files can be found here.

Lee Griggs
Arnold rendering specialist
AUTODESK
Message 9 of 18
LMimagery
in reply to: LMimagery

Thank you so much, having never worked with VDB, so I'll try and get back later sometime, thanks again

Message 10 of 18
LMimagery
in reply to: LMimagery

Just a comment, the tutorial does not mention the VDB or its settings to start so you might want to add that

Message 11 of 18
LMimagery
in reply to: LMimagery

Hi Lee...got an idea on some of the problems I've been having....now for the latest....there are several (many) cloud vdb's I got from the internet which I can not see their bounding box in the viewing window...is there an easy way to get an idea of their size or to size them so they fit a window? Problem 2, following your Polymesh to Volume, I am lost when it comes to adding the image to the displacement texture...can you take a look at the attached pictures and let me know if I am doing this all wrong? Thank you so much for trying to get me through this

489-screen-shot-2017-11-26-at-104059-am.png

490-screen-shot-2017-11-26-at-104044-am.png

Message 12 of 18
LMimagery
in reply to: LMimagery

Just figure out the sizing problem, which was not a sizing problem at all, the volume cage would not show at all unless I moved the timeline to frame 5.....crazy but true, then that is fine....sorry to bother you on that one, if you can get me going on mapping the texture I would appreciate it, Thank you

Message 13 of 18
lee_griggs
in reply to: LMimagery

That is displacement for poly meshes. You need to connect the image to volume_displacement.496-volume-displacement.jpg

Lee Griggs
Arnold rendering specialist
AUTODESK
Message 14 of 18
LMimagery
in reply to: LMimagery

Thank you so much...I am definitely more on track now....the latest question concerns the use of the Camera Projection Shader......and the value you use in the Range Output Max......first the Camera Projection.....is the attached picture using the Camera Projection correctly? I can not get the render to look anything like expected.....the example without it is much more promising, but your Tutorial example is drop dead gorgeous......so I really want to know the correct methodology. The

510-screen-shot-2017-11-27-at-83915-pm.png

s

511-screen-shot-2017-11-27-at-82305-pm.png

econd question may be totally tied to the above and my misuse...but is the Output max highly dependent on the Texture file? I can't seem to get over a value of 1 or 2 without some of the geometry totally disappearing

Again thank you so much for getting me through this

Message 15 of 18
lee_griggs
in reply to: LMimagery

That's it! You are pretty much there. It doesn't have to be a Camera projection. You can try different types of projection to see what works best. Just have a go at experimenting with different textures to see what works best. I tried many textures before I found something that worked. The Range shader is really useful for adjusting the look of the volume. You could also try adding a Ramp inbetween to adjust the falloff of the texture between the volume and the head.

Lee Griggs
Arnold rendering specialist
AUTODESK
Message 16 of 18
LMimagery
in reply to: LMimagery

IN the example above that I used the camera projection, am I wired right? I could not seem to make that work at all with several textures.....and I take it that the Output Max is different depending on the effect and texture you use?

THank you again

Message 17 of 18
LMimagery
in reply to: LMimagery

2 things, in this example I had to scale the image to 12 to get close to the size I wanted, but the horizontal lines (textures edges??) appear, any way to eliminate them? And could you please post a picture of the network editor for your example, I can't imagine how you can get to output max in RANGE over .3 or so without losing your geometry...THanks again for all your help

519-screen-shot-2017-11-28-at-100700-pm.png

Message 18 of 18
lee_griggs
in reply to: LMimagery

You can use a UV Transform shader for careful positioning of the texture.

>And could you please post a picture of the network editor for your example,

There is a screengrab at the bottom of the tutorial.

>I can't imagine how you can get to output max in RANGE over .3 or so without losing your geometry.

Yes, you do, but it looks better for it 🙂

Lee Griggs
Arnold rendering specialist
AUTODESK

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report